This Is AGI. Prove Us Wrong.

Seattle, WA

Are we really building AGI?

Seattle builds more AI than almost any city on Earth. The engineers here aren't trying to build AGI — they're shipping products, hitting business targets, making models faster and cheaper. But the industry wrapped around their work insists that every step is bringing us closer to general intelligence. Scaling laws. Emergent capabilities.

June 26, 2026

Town Hall Seattle — 1119 8th Ave, Seattle, WA 98101

3 PM - 7 PM

An evening of provocation, falsification, and the questions the AI field has never asked. Every contribution becomes part of the peer-reviewed Seattle 2026 City AGI Report.

Contributing to the Seattle 2026 City AGI Report

This isn't just an event. Every contribution at this event will be assessed against empirical and theoretical scientific standards, documented in a peer-reviewed publication, and synthesized into the 2026 Annual AGI Report.

Publication

Seattle 2026 City AGI Report

Every contribution at this event will be assessed against empirical and theoretical scientific standards, documented in a peer-reviewed publication, and become part of GEA's permanent scientific record of where AGI research stands.

Read more →
Annual Publication

2026 Annual AGI Report

A cumulative annual synthesis of every City AGI Report — GEA's science-grounded counterpart to industry AI reports. Where AGI research actually stands, measured by science rather than benchmarks or capital flows.

Read more →
Publication

Seattle 2026 City AGI Report

The City AGI Report is the formal scientific output of each "This Is AGI. Prove Us Wrong." event. After every tour stop, GEA publishes a peer-reviewed report documenting the contributions made by the presenters, the audience challenges raised against them, and the scientific standing of each position.

The report is not a transcript, and it is not a prediction. What it does is describe how well each contribution is grounded in empirical evidence and established theoretical principles at the time of publication.

A position may have strong scientific backing, rest on a coherent but untested theoretical framework, rely on engineering results without an underlying scientific account, or rest on no identifiable scientific basis at all — in which case the report will say so plainly.

Each report is reviewed by a standing board of named researchers. The board is public. The methodology is public. The reviewers sign their work.

Before publication, every presenter receives the review board's assessment and is offered the opportunity to submit a written response, published alongside the assessment.

Annual Publication

2026 Annual AGI Report

The Annual AGI Report is GEA's flagship publication: a peer-reviewed yearly synthesis of every City AGI Report produced during the preceding tour year.

It exists because the existing annual AI publications do not ask the right questions. Industry reports measure capital deployed, parameters trained, and benchmarks beaten. The Annual AGI Report asks how well each contribution is grounded in empirical evidence and established theoretical principles.

Each edition identifies which scientific questions advanced during the year, which remain open, and which the field is still refusing to ask.

Over time, the Annual AGI Report is intended to become a canonical reference for anyone who wants to understand the state of AGI research as a scientific question, separate from the commercial interests of the companies producing the technology.

The Program

The program weaves provocative statements with guest perspectives from researchers, founders, and investors who see the cracks in the current AI narrative. Every presenter — including guest speakers — is subject to the same challenge. No one gets a free pass. Each statement and each perspective is open to be broken by anyone in the room. The evening closes with a panel where the speakers and the audience go head to head on what held up and what didn't.

Duration
3 hours + networking
Experience
Statements, guest perspectives, live challenges, and a closing panel — followed by networking with beer & wine
General
3.10pm
Keynote
The Uphill Crusade against the AGI Hype
Hessie Jones
Read more →
Hessie Jones
Hessie Jones
Cofounder, Personally Identifiable Information Standards Architecture
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
The Uphill Crusade against the AGI Hype
This Is AGI
a basic definition is an effective transfer of knowledge across different problems, akin to how a human brain works.
An illusory concept of a world, ambitiously marketed by Silicon Valley elites that debases human purpose while miraculously creating an Eden for humanity.
Statement 01: AGI research is scienceless.
3.25pm
Statement
The Scienceless Field: Why AI Has No Idea What It's Building
Adam Peer
Every engineering field in human history has been built on a science. Mechanical engineering on Newtonian mechanics. Electrical engineering on Maxwell...
Read more →
Adam Peer
Adam Peer
VP, Strategic Partnership, Global Economic Alliance
Eugene, OR, USA
The Scienceless Field: Why AI Has No Idea What It's Building
Presentation Summary
Every engineering field in human history has been built on a science. Mechanical engineering on Newtonian mechanics. Electrical engineering on Maxwell's equations. Chemical engineering on thermodynamics and atomic theory. Aerospace engineering on fluid dynamics. The pattern is universal: science discovers nature's blueprint, then engineering builds with it. AI is the only engineering field that has reversed this order. It is trying to engineer intelligence without first establishing what intelligence physically is. After seven decades and hundreds of billions of dollars, the field still cannot offer a scientific definition of its own target. It cannot say what intelligence is, where it comes from, what physical principles govern it, or how to measure its presence in a system. What it offers instead are benchmarks, scaling laws, and capability demonstrations — engineering outputs presented as if they were scientific findings. They are not. This presentation makes the case that AGI will not be built by accident, that the current path is not converging on a science it skipped, and that until the AI field accepts intelligence as a physical phenomenon requiring its own theoretical foundation, it will continue to engineer something it does not understand. The audience is invited to break the argument.
The Statements

9 statements are presented live. Each one is built on the last. Each one is open to be broken by anyone in the room.

Science
01

AGI research is scienceless.

Every engineering field is built on a science — nature's blueprint for how to build. AI has none.

02

Intelligence is fundamental physics, not emergence.

The AI field believes intelligence emerges from complexity. It doesn't. Intelligence is as fundamental to the universe as gravity.

06

AGI will never have free will or consciousness.

Physics tells us the universe supports free will — just not inside a computer. Within any computational system, free will and consciousness are theoretically impossible. They cannot be built. They cannot emerge.

03

Comprehension, not reasoning, is the key to AGI.

Every AI system reasons. None of them comprehend. Reasoning follows rules. Comprehension understands why the rules exist and what happens when you use them. Without it, AI has no awareness of the consequences of its actions — on the environment, on others, or on itself.

Engineering
04

AGI requires a single algorithm.

But not the Master Algorithm as popularized by Pedro Domingos. A single algorithm can only come from a scientific understanding of intelligence.

05

AGI cannot be pretrained.

Name a biological lifeform born with pretrained knowledge of its environment. The scaling hypothesis has no precedent in nature.

Economics
07

ASI will break one of the fundamentals of capitalism — because capitalism is tied to physics.

Capitalism isn't just an economic theory. It's bound to the physical laws of the universe. ASI will sever one of those bonds. The system cannot survive it.

Governance
08

Democracy is structurally incompatible with ASI.

Democracy was invented to overturn tyranny. It was never structurally designed for long-term thinking beyond — in today's terms — 2, 4, and 6 year reelection cycles. ASI brings long-term visibility that no democratic system in the past 2,500 years has been able to fully embrace.

Geopolitics
09

AGI is a top priority for intelligence agencies.

Nick Bostrom in Superintelligence and Leopold Aschenbrenner in Situational Awareness assume intelligence agencies aren't paying attention to AGI because it's too far into the future. That is demonstrably false.

Tickets
Seattle, WA
June 26, 2026
Town Hall Seattle

Tickets will be available soon.

Venue

Town Hall Seattle

1119 8th Ave, Seattle, WA 98101

June 26, 2026 — 3 PM - 7 PM

SELECT TICKETS

Admission

0

Premium

0

Total $0

ATTENDEE DETAILS

By purchasing, you agree to appear on the public attendee list (name, title, company only). Photo ID required at check-in.